BHM.CITYAll stories
Features

Brum vs London: Why Birmingham Is Finally Winning

For decades, Birmingham played second fiddle. The gap is closing - and in some areas, Brum has pulled ahead.

The Brum vs London argument used to be easy to dismiss. London had everything – the culture, the restaurants, the career opportunities, the international connections – and Birmingham had lower house prices and a slightly defensive chip on its shoulder about it. That framing is getting harder to maintain.

The economic case changed first. London rents have reached a point where the city is actively exporting its young professional class – not to Birmingham specifically, but the data shows net migration out of London to the Midlands and North has increased significantly post-pandemic. The ability to work remotely, even partially, changed the calculation. A two-bedroom flat in Harborne costs a third of an equivalent flat in Hackney. The quality is comparable or better. The commute to a once-a-week London office is 80 minutes. The maths works.

The food is now a legitimate argument. Birmingham has more Michelin-starred restaurants per capita than London – a statistical quirk that depends on how you define the calculation, but the core point stands: Adam’s, Purnell’s, Carters of Moseley, Opheem (the UK’s highest-rated Indian restaurant) are operating at a level that would be celebrated anywhere. The city that was synonymous with curry house and Balti Triangle (honourable as those are) now has a fine dining scene with genuine international standing.

The cultural infrastructure has improved quietly and substantially. The Symphony Hall on Broad Street is consistently ranked among the finest concert halls in Europe – the acoustics are extraordinary and major international orchestras choose to record here for that reason. The Birmingham Royal Ballet, the City of Birmingham Symphony Orchestra, and the Birmingham Repertory Theatre give the city a cultural depth that most comparably sized cities can’t match.

The Commonwealth Games in 2022 functioned as a coming-out party. Birmingham hosted an event of genuinely global scale – 72 nations competing across venues across the city – and it mostly worked. The world watched and saw a city that was confident, diverse, and operational in a way that surprised people who’d last formed an opinion about Birmingham in 1994.

What Birmingham still lacks: the density of industry-specific job clusters that make London careers easier to navigate; the international transport connections; the presumption of quality that London venues get by virtue of being London venues. The city is still doing PR work on its own behalf that London stopped needing to do forty years ago.

But the gap is real and closing. A generation of Brummies stopped apologising for where they’re from and started explaining why it’s worth choosing. The conversation has shifted. Brum didn’t become London. It became something more interesting – a major city with the infrastructure of a capital and the identity of somewhere that built things with its hands.